<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Switcher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://switcher.macblog.me/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://switcher.macblog.me</link>
	<description>the day-to-day experience of a Mac switcher</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on I bought Windows 7 by watswitppl</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/06/i-bought-windows-7/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>watswitppl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=223#comment-459</guid>
		<description>wow, yer sew smrt..... 
whats with all the freakin' idiot-gods (meaning very very very very mentally challenged) on this blog site... it pisses me off knowing that 99% of bloggers are mentally below the age of 5 years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, yer sew smrt&#8230;..<br />
whats with all the freakin&#8217; idiot-gods (meaning very very very very mentally challenged) on this blog site&#8230; it pisses me off knowing that 99% of bloggers are mentally below the age of 5 years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rogers doesn&#8217;t support MMS by watswitppl</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/06/rogers-doesnt-support-mms/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>watswitppl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=212#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Question... have you or will you ever have the mental capabilities to start your own mobile phone company? many problems come into play when things like the "mms" problem come into play, one of which could be the higher volume of people using their MMS technology on the NEW IPHONES, in which thousands have already been sold. Due to everyone being on the 3G Network now, its causing alot of stress on computers and towers to relay and even connect users, its not that they don't deliver cause this is only a 2 day problem thus far. 

once you learn the world of emails, you can start sending pictures to yourself via that :)

as for ven... should i even say it... you take the cake for d*****t man alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question&#8230; have you or will you ever have the mental capabilities to start your own mobile phone company? many problems come into play when things like the &#8220;mms&#8221; problem come into play, one of which could be the higher volume of people using their MMS technology on the NEW IPHONES, in which thousands have already been sold. Due to everyone being on the 3G Network now, its causing alot of stress on computers and towers to relay and even connect users, its not that they don&#8217;t deliver cause this is only a 2 day problem thus far. </p>
<p>once you learn the world of emails, you can start sending pictures to yourself via that <img src='http://switcher.macblog.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>as for ven&#8230; should i even say it&#8230; you take the cake for d*****t man alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rogers &#038; iPhone MMS problem by watswitppl</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/06/rogers-iphone-mms-problem/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>watswitppl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=216#comment-457</guid>
		<description>You really dont listen to them when you call do you? your not supposed to call from the phone on which you are having the problem, and go read some other blogs some time, it will help you and your frustration. obviously 90% of the population has a computer or access to one, its not that hard to walk to a library and pay 5$ or a friends house to read other people blogs on this statement instead you create your own, which i think was utterly pointless. feeds like this are supposed to HELP people, and your annoying nagging and ranting just annoys people, if you hate rogers, go to a new provider, it would help all other rogers users, one less problem to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really dont listen to them when you call do you? your not supposed to call from the phone on which you are having the problem, and go read some other blogs some time, it will help you and your frustration. obviously 90% of the population has a computer or access to one, its not that hard to walk to a library and pay 5$ or a friends house to read other people blogs on this statement instead you create your own, which i think was utterly pointless. feeds like this are supposed to HELP people, and your annoying nagging and ranting just annoys people, if you hate rogers, go to a new provider, it would help all other rogers users, one less problem to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rogers &#038; iPhone MMS problem by Rick D</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/06/rogers-iphone-mms-problem/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=216#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Seriously? I haven't had any success with Rogers MMS in my iPhone either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? I haven&#8217;t had any success with Rogers MMS in my iPhone either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rogers doesn&#8217;t support MMS by Ven</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/06/rogers-doesnt-support-mms/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Ven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=212#comment-95</guid>
		<description>i just jailbroke my iphone and the feeling is like you have new phone in your hands. you should try :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just jailbroke my iphone and the feeling is like you have new phone in your hands. you should try <img src='http://switcher.macblog.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook Pro : 4-cores at least! by Switcher » MacBook Pro : 4-cores at least!</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/04/macbook-pro-4-cores-at-least/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Switcher » MacBook Pro : 4-cores at least!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=188#comment-90</guid>
		<description>[...] iAPX wrote an interesting post today onSwitcher &#194;&#187; &#60;b&#62;MacBook Pro&#60;/b&#62; : 4-cores at least!Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iAPX wrote an interesting post today onSwitcher &Acirc;&raquo; &lt;b&gt;MacBook Pro&lt;/b&gt; : 4-cores at least!Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook Pro downgrade by Switcher » MacBook Pro downgrade</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/06/macbook-pro-downgrade/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Switcher » MacBook Pro downgrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=208#comment-87</guid>
		<description>[...] iAPX wrote an interesting post today onSwitcher &#194;&#187; &#60;b&#62;MacBook&#60;/b&#62; Pro downgradeHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iAPX wrote an interesting post today onSwitcher &Acirc;&raquo; &lt;b&gt;MacBook&lt;/b&gt; Pro downgradeHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook Pro : 4-cores at least! by iAPX</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/04/macbook-pro-4-cores-at-least/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>iAPX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=188#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I hope too. I agree with you, except for the corrct use of a quad-core computer where Jaguar, Tiger or Leopard is just fine with that :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope too. I agree with you, except for the corrct use of a quad-core computer where Jaguar, Tiger or Leopard is just fine with that <img src='http://switcher.macblog.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook Pro : 4-cores at least! by iAPX</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/04/macbook-pro-4-cores-at-least/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>iAPX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=188#comment-40</guid>
		<description>That's exactly what Windows do since Windows NT on 1993, or Mac OS X since 2001, or unix flavors since the 60's. Handling priorities, and assigning DYNAMICALLY mono-thread programs to cores.

But when you have one program running (whatever the number of programs opened but doing nothing) that is mono-threaded, your 8-core 16 threads new MacPro won't perform better than an iMac or a consumer 700$ Core2 Duo 3.0Ghz computer!

That's the point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what Windows do since Windows NT on 1993, or Mac OS X since 2001, or unix flavors since the 60&#8217;s. Handling priorities, and assigning DYNAMICALLY mono-thread programs to cores.</p>
<p>But when you have one program running (whatever the number of programs opened but doing nothing) that is mono-threaded, your 8-core 16 threads new MacPro won&#8217;t perform better than an iMac or a consumer 700$ Core2 Duo 3.0Ghz computer!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MacBook Pro : 4-cores at least! by yaniki</title>
		<link>http://switcher.macblog.me/2009/04/macbook-pro-4-cores-at-least/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>yaniki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://switcher.macblog.me/?p=188#comment-36</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="#commentbody-35"&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="#comment-35" rel="nofollow"&gt;iAPX&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
But Snow Leopard won’t magically transform non-multithreaded programs into multi-threaded ones.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes, but the "solution" in this case means i.a. management of single-threaded apps and assigning the apps to the cores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-35"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-35" rel="nofollow">iAPX</a> :</strong><br />
But Snow Leopard won’t magically transform non-multithreaded programs into multi-threaded ones.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, but the &#8220;solution&#8221; in this case means i.a. management of single-threaded apps and assigning the apps to the cores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
